In The Devil’s Hand, Jack Carr shifts the focus of the contemporary thriller from the mechanics of the Global War on Terror to a meditation on its long-term psychological and strategic consequences. Writing on the twentieth anniversary of the September 11 attacks, Carr uses the narrative to explore the concept of asymmetric warfare through the eyes of adversaries who have spent two decades observing the United States from across the poker table. The novel suggests that while the West was focused on short-term tactical victories, its enemies were engaged in a patient study of American vulnerabilities, internal political divisions, and bureaucratic inertia.
While the novel itself is great reading, the questions that Carr asks challenge deeply held beliefs and assumptions about American supremacy. This is an uncomfortable reflection, but absolutely necessary for all Americans, and the West in general.
So, let’s look at the themes and then I’ll get into weeds a little more with my experience and enjoyment of this book.

The Intellectual Framework of the Long Game
The central intellectual theme of the novel is the long game played by state actors and terrorist organizations. Carr posits that adversaries like Iran, Russia, and China have not been idle since 2001; instead, they have used the intervening years to refine tactics that exploit the specific weaknesses of a superpower. The narrative is built on the premise that all warfare is based on deception and the Sun Tzu-inspired goal of subduing an enemy without a direct, conventional fight.
The plot centers on a terrifying biological threat: Marburg Variant U, a pathogen originally developed and weaponized by the Soviet Union. The brilliance of the enemy plan in the book lies not just in the lethality of the virus, but in the expectation of the American response. The adversaries intend to trigger a Cold War-era cleansing wind protocol, essentially forcing the United States government to incinerate its own cities to contain what it believes is an airborne contagion. This theme explores the terrifying possibility of the American military-industrial complex being turned into an autoimmune disease, where the nation’s defense mechanisms destroy the host they were designed to protect.
I plan to go deeper into this theme with a deep dive, so please subscribe below to ensure you don’t miss it.
The Ethics of Targeted Elimination
Carr dives deeply into the morality and legality of state-sponsored eliminations, or what the Israelis refer to as Chissulim. Through the protagonist James Reece, the novel asks whether there is a meaningful ethical distinction between a remote drone strike from fifty thousand feet and a precision rifle shot from a thousand yards. The book explores how the increasing reliance on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may have fueled accidental guerrilla syndrome, recruiting more enemies than they eliminate.
Reece is portrayed not as a standard hero, but as a sentinel or messenger. He operates as an instrument of Wrath of God style justice, a reference to the Mossad response to the Munich Massacre. The relationship between Reece and the newly elected President Alec Christensen is particularly complex. Christensen is a man driven by personal vengeance, seeking to finish the work started in 2001 by hunting down the facilitators and enablers of the 9/11 attacks who still live among the populace. This dynamic challenges the reader to consider the intersection of personal grief and national policy.
The Republic and the Deep State
Another major theme is the fragility of American cultural and political institutions. The novel defines the Deep State not as a shadowy cabal, but as the weight of established bureaucracy and the elite interests of academia, big tech, and the media. Carr suggests that these institutions are often more concerned with maintaining their own power and narratives than with addressing existential threats.
The character of Senator Edward Thwaite represents the cynical side of this bureaucracy, viewing national crises primarily as opportunities to consolidate power and cancel political opponents. The contrast between the self-serving political class in Washington and the sentinels like Reece, who operate in the shadows, underscores the novel’s critique of modern American leadership.
Perspective and Reflection on Theme
The book is structured around the idea that “what’s past is prologue”. It forces a confrontation with the reality that the United States may still not fully understand the nature of the conflict it has been engaged in for decades. By the end of the narrative, the message is clear: the enemy is patient, the republic is divided, and the only defense is a constant, prepared vigilance.
Ultimately, The Devil’s Hand is less about the action on the page and more about the questions it leaves behind regarding the endurance of an empire and the cost of a short-war strategy applied to a multi-generational conflict. It is a provocative look at how a nation’s own protocols and divisions can be weaponized against it, turning the tools of safety into instruments of ruin.
Into The Weeds… time to be a fan
What I particularly liked about The Devil’s Hand was that it was back on American soil, with almost all the action centred there. Carr has a lethal capacity to write in that arena, coupling foreign and domestic threats with issues of the Republic. The political set up in that respect was truly great.
The chapter where Reece meets the president and the president lays out all the details regarding the authorisation for military force since 9/11 was essential beyond the narrative in the book. It felt like a civics class, yet one I really wanted to attend. But Carr spins this out into not only a concerning look at the thin use of military force justification from more than two decades ago, still being employed now, but as a device to send Reece off to take out the remaining 9/11 conspirators. And it was not lost on me how, for the president, this mission mirrored aspects of Reece’s campaign of vengeance in The Terminal List. It wasn’t lost on Reece either and there seemed to be some consideration from him as to whether he was doing the right thing. This was good to see. Reece is a brutally efficient man of action but what makes him truly brilliant is that he is also a thinking man. However, the speed at which he makes his decisions, and makes the right decision, usually to protect the many, is what makes him so lethal. Where others would hesitate or linger to think, they might lose. The calculus for Reece always comes quick and fast. For example, I really enjoyed it when Dr. Haley Garrett asked him “What are you going to do?” and he simply yet immediately replied “Whatever it takes.”
Carr offers a masterclass of plot in this book. So many threads woven together. But even at the highest level it’s genius. Firstly, there’s the question of whether there are 9/11 conspirators left out there and, perhaps more importantly, that Iran was in fact behind 9/11 and still has control over the remaining conspirators. Secondly, that Iran continues to plot the demise of America, this time through the release of a bio weapon. And for Carr to go down that route, hot on the heals of the Covid-19 pandemic and not have it feel like jumping on the band wagon was masterfully done. Not to mention the amount of detail on the biological threat and how he kept it so interesting. I’ve said it before, Carr has a way to write so much detail into the narrative and still keep you engrossed and engaged. But the biggest and most scary thread of this book was the U.S. plan in place should such a deadly virus take hold and escape containment. This was presented in such a believable way that I got chills contemplating it. And lastly, there was the political manoeuvring by the president’s political enemies, putting Reece back in the headlines and under threat of PMCs.
One of my favourite scenes was when one of the PMCs went full fanboy watching Reece take down some Iranians. Incredibly hilarious, especially when the dude said he was going to rub one out later thinking about the takedown by Reece. This shows that Carr is able to write with heavy themes, yet still have fun with it and not get bogged down.
Katie continues to be a force of her own, showing her ongoing intellect with her investigative journalism. But we also got to see her in the fight in this book. Reece arranged for her to receive training and it paid off. Either her, Reece, or both of them might have otherwise ended up dead.
It was also good to see Reece working with Dr. Haley Garrett. It was an opportunity to see him through a fresh pair of eyes. Initially misjudged, he was soon seen for what he is, someone willing to sacrifice it all to do the right thing, against all the odds, no matter what.
The conclusion was satisfying, although I will need to immediately continue to read the rest of the series to find out just what was in that letter from his father at the end of the previous book. There’s a point to be made on this, that Carr doesn’t rush things. He introduced this but was willing to sit on it. That’s not a bad thing. Likewise, he’s taken his time to slowly bring Reece closer and closer to working fully for the CIA. Again, this is worth it. The reader is seeing it develop at a natural pace and so it feels real when it gets there. I’m sure I also said the same thing previously about the development of his relationship with Katie.
I’m four books into this series now and couldn’t be happier with it. It feels real, it feels just, and I only want to get on and read the rest.
Futher Reading
Carr always taps into the literary catalog with his books, so I like to surface them.
Books and Authors in the Narrative
- History of the Peloponnesian War by Thucydides: Referenced in the preface for the “Melian Dialogue,” specifically the characterization of hope as “danger’s comforter,” which translates in modern intelligence to “hope is not a course of action”.
- The Art of War by Sun Tzu: Featured as a foundational text for the novel’s themes of asymmetric warfare, specifically the axioms that “the supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting” and “all warfare is based on deception”.
- The Great Game by Peter Hopkirk: A central intellectual touchstone for the novel, this book is featured on Erik Sawyer’s bookshelf and later serves as a “one-time pad” codebook for the assassin Nizar Kattan to decipher encrypted contracts.
- The Hot Zone by Richard Preston: Discussed by James Reece and Katie Buranek during a conversation about biological warfare and the 1989 Marburg/Ebola scare in Reston, Virginia.
- Pharma: Greed, Lies, and the Poisoning of America by Gerald Posner: Mentioned by Senator Edward Thwaite as a modern-day exposé on the opioid epidemic.
- The Jungle by Upton Sinclair: Referenced by Senator Thwaite as a historical comparison for Posner’s work on the pharmaceutical industry.
- Profiles in Courage by John F. Kennedy: Mentioned as a point of comparison for Alec Christensen’s book during his political rise.
- Lost Horizon by James Hilton: Referred to in the context of the paradise “Shangri-La,” which was the original name Franklin D. Roosevelt gave to the presidential retreat now known as Camp David.
- Revolt in the Desert by T. E. Lawrence: A first edition copy of this work is identified on the bookshelf of Erik Sawyer, the founder of the private military company Masada.
- The 9/11 Commission Report: Cited as a document studied by Iranian intelligence and later discussed by President Christensen regarding its “File Seventeen” and the twenty-eight redacted pages concerning Saudi connections.



Leave a Reply